- @monther7 The best way to get all your articles into one profile is through the new Scopus Author Feedback Wizard: http://t.co/tjORo98 in reply to monther7 2011-08-10
Tag Archive for 'identity'
- Recent Nature article I was interviewed for and quoted in: “Social media: Self-reflection”, online http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nj7340-667a #li #
- #scibarcamb #li (@ Cambridge Union Society) http://4sq.com/f1276N #
- “Scopus Author Feedback Wizard pilot: Published researchers, please help test this new tool. Thanks.”( http://twitthis.com/uhnv3b ) #
- InMaps – I visualized my LinkedIn network http://t.co/MClZKUa #
# habib: RT @jaykaydee: My dissertation: “Beliefs and Uses of Tagging Among Undergraduates” http://bit.ly/97bJQI If you’re into that sort of thing
# habib: RT @mfenner: New blog post: ORCID session at #solo10 and other important #orcid news http://bit.ly/crZzWg
# habib: RT @gthorisson: My latest SlideShare upload: ORCID presentation from Science Online London 2010 – http://slidesha.re/dqjO0F
# habib: RT @ORCID_Org: We’re officially a non-profit! Announced today, ORCID initiative is now ORCID, Inc http://bit.ly/c8L8hW
# RT @IanMulvany: #solo10 some pics and links to presentations from the session I hosted. http://directedgraph.net/2010/09/07/solo10-presentation-slides/
# WEBINAR (free): The Future of Search and Discovery, Sept. 8 w/ Jud Dunham and Cameron Neylon http://t.co/tiia9JS
# RT @Machemes: New and Unique Tool Eases the Process of Finding Article Reviewers: The search is based on the Scopus macheme fo… http://bit.ly/9U3bEy
# My slides from Connecting Scientific Resources at Science Online London 2010 available at http://t.co/3vrgEc1 #solo10 #li @IanMulvany @rjw
- Nice summary article of the issue.
- Privacy and recommendation systems.
- “His presentation on scholarly identity 2.0 reminds me that academic libraries’ strategic planning should include a line item about assisting faculty with managing their digital reputation and identity (even promoting it).”
- Cornelius Puschmann’s Blog “…after which I went on a long but practically-oriented rant on scholarly communication in the digital age. “
The videos of the Belgrade lectures are now loaded on the University of Belgrade Library’s YouTube channel.
The second day’s presentation was the more interesting topic and a better presentation overall, so I am going to highlight it first. A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is here and the playlist for the second lecture is embedded below:
The first day’s presentation was titled From Academic Library 2.0 to (Literature) Research 2.0. A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is located here and the playlist is embedded below:
I look forward to any feedback you might have on either presentation.
As mentioned in my previous post, my first Belgrade lecture focused on the concept of Research 2.0. The second lecture focused on Scholarly Identity 2.0, which is increasingly important because of the wealth of online identity information created by Research 2.0.
The Scholarly Identity Matrix below is adapted from a general identity matrix concept pioneered by the founders of ClaimID. It is meant to display the different types and components of a researcher’s online identity.
The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model below displays how the different components from the Matrix fit together.
The black text is content types. The blue are the characteristics of identity these content types best represent. The green is who is responsible for managing this information. The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model takes the series of concept models one step farther, but with a slightly different twist.
The spectrum is more specific than in past models with one end being entirely user-generated content (UGC) and the other traditional scholarly communication. My hypothesis is that scholarly identity online, or Scholarly Identity 2.0, is a combination of these two information types held together by a unique identifier. For example, the combination verifies not just topical expertise through peer-review of articles, but also personality verified by LinkedIn recommendations.
Please share your thoughts on the accuracy of this model in the comments below or on FriendFeed.
The below presentation covers each quadrant of the Matrix culminating in the Concept Model as a summary.
Scholarly Identity 2.0:
What does the Web say about your research
What does the Web say about your research
View more presentations from Michael Habib.
(Update: The videos of the lecture are now available here.)
I would like to give special thanks to Adam Sofronijevic, at the University of Belgrade Libraries for all his hard work in arranging the lectures and for his hospitality during my visit.
The above is an evolution of the Academic Library 2.0 Concept Models developed for my Master’s Paper. While the original model primarily focused on academic library services for students, the new model focuses on services for researchers.
Like in the original models, the top represents communication spaces grounded in physical space, while the bottom mirrors this in the online realm.
Two ends of the spectrum are informal communications and formal communications. My argument is that Research 2.0 falls somewhere between these extremes. I developed the model for the presentation below.
(Update: A video of the presentation is located here.)
This model is meant to capture Research 2.0 as concerns scholarly communication and not research conducted through 2.0 methods such as Galaxy Zoo.
I am eager to receive feedback on how well this model represents the concept of Research 2.0.
- Where is it limited?
- Where is it right? Wrong?
- Please feel free to leave comments below (or on FriendFeed)
I had the opportunity to revisit my concept models and develop this variation when preparing for recent lectures hosted by the University of Belgrade Libraries with support from the Serbian Ministry of Science and Technological Development and the Serbian library consortium KoBSON. While there, I also had the opportunity to visit the Institute of Technical Sciences Library and the National Library of Serbia; both of which are working on a number of interesting projects.
The first of these lectures is above, the second lecture (and another new model) will follow in a separate post that explores the concept of Scholarly Identity 2.0.
I would like to give special thanks to Adam Sofronijevic, at the University of Belgrade Libraries for all his hard work in arranging the lectures and for his hospitality during my visit.
- Scholarly Perspectives – Webinars“We invite you to register for a special series of 65-minute webinars featuring three speakers: a library expert, a senior faculty member and an Elsevier product specialist. Speakers will share their views and insights on the evolving role of peer-reviewed journals and books and how the electronic platforms on which these vital resources are hosted, are also leveraging novel information discovery and retrieval techniques to enhance the research and teaching processes.”
- YouTube video – “Scopus offers a freely accessible author search for everyone who has no access to Scopus. This preview search allows anyone to look up a specific author and check their profile for numbers of documents published, numbers of references, received citations and the h-index and more.
This demo also shows you how to provide feedback if you think something is not accurate. Feel free to recommend the URL: www.scopus.com/authoridentifier for free author searching.” - Innovation Management site from the Faculty of Organizational Sciences Department of Operations Management at the University of Belgrade
- Poster Gallery for the Institute of Technical Sciences of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. One of the ways that their librarian is highlighting the work of Institute researchers.
- “Serbian Web Journalism School was founded by Ljubisa Bojic at Serbian Journalist Association. The project was inspired by David Sasaki, outreach director of Global Voices Online, Rebecca MacKinnon, professor of new media at University of Kong Kong, Nino Brajovic, president of Journalist Association of Serbia and Gradimir joksimovic, editor of Viva magazine.”
