Session abstract:
Do you have data? Have you decided that you want to publish that data in a friendly way? Then this session is for you. Allowing your data to be linked to other data sets is an obvious way to make your data more useful, and to contribute back to the data community that you are a part of, but the mechanics of how you do that is not always so clear cut. This session will discuss just that. With experts from the publishing world, the liked data community, and scientific data services, this is a unique opportunity to get an insight into how to create linked scientific data, and what you can do with it once you have created it.
- http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/programme.php?tab=abstracts#breakout8

Richard Wallis’ slides from the session are available here:

http://www.slideshare.net/rjw/the-linked-data-publishing-threestep

Thanks to Ian Mulvany for organizing the panel:

http://directedgraph.net/2010/08/27/connecting-scientific-data/

]]> http://mchabib.com/2010/09/06/presentation-connecting-publications-and-data-connecting-scientific-resources-breakout-science-online-london-2010/feed/ 0 http://mchabib.com/2010/02/17/links-for-2010-02-16/ http://mchabib.com/2010/02/17/links-for-2010-02-16/#comments Wed, 17 Feb 2010 04:01:30 +0000 Michael C. Habib http://mchabib.com/2010/02/17/links-for-2010-02-16/

• Data is at the heart of new science ecosystem – DATA – Research Information
  Article by Rafael: “Offering their content through open APIs, publishers and platform providers can present researchers with application building tools based on more comprehensive content. In fact, publishers and platform providers have an opportunity to serve as the host of the new scientific knowledge ecosystem that is evolving.”
  (tags: elsevier, apis, data, science, scholarlycommunication)

• The Indispensable Man of Open Science: A Talk with Cameron Neylon « Significant Science
  Lengthy and detailed interview with Cameron Neylon touching on just about everything related to Open Science.
  (tags: openscience opennotebook cameronneylon interview elsevier)

The videos of the Belgrade lectures are now loaded on the University of Belgrade Library’s YouTube channel.

The second day’s presentation was the more interesting topic and a better presentation overall, so I am going to highlight it first.  A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is here and the playlist for the second lecture is embedded below:

The first day’s presentation was titled From Academic Library 2.0 to (Literature) Research 2.0.  A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is located here and the playlist is embedded below:

I look forward to any feedback you might have on either presentation.

As mentioned in my previous post, my first Belgrade lecture focused on the concept of Research 2.0.  The second lecture focused on Scholarly Identity 2.0, which is increasingly important because of the wealth of online identity information created by Research 2.0.

The Scholarly Identity Matrix below is adapted from a general identity matrix concept pioneered by the founders of ClaimID. It is meant to display the different types and components of a researcher’s online identity.

The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model below displays how the different components from the Matrix fit together.

The black text is content types. The blue are the characteristics of identity these content types best represent. The green is who is responsible for managing this information. The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model takes the series of concept models one step farther, but with a slightly different twist.

The spectrum is more specific than in past models with one end being entirely user-generated content (UGC) and the other traditional scholarly communication. My hypothesis is that scholarly identity online, or Scholarly Identity 2.0, is a combination of these two information types held together by a unique identifier. For example, the combination verifies not just topical expertise through peer-review of articles, but also personality verified by LinkedIn recommendations.

Please share your thoughts on the accuracy of this model in the comments below or on FriendFeed.

The below presentation covers each quadrant of the Matrix culminating in the Concept Model as a summary.

• The eScience revolution: Creating semantic Web platforms for massive scientific collaboration
  (tags: science semantic toread)

Scholarly Reputation Management Online: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media
Session 6: Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0
Social Software @ Work

• All 2.0
  feed portal
  (tags: science20)

• arXiv.org help – Author Identifiers
  (tags: identity)
• Science Online London 2009
  Less than 50 spots left…. “The Web is rapidly changing the communication, practice and culture of science. Science online London 2009 will explore the latest trends in science online. How is the Web affecting the work of researchers, science communicators, journalists, librarians, educators, students? What can you do to make the best use of the growing number of online tools?”
  (tags: ScienceOnlineLondon2009 ScienceOnline ScienceBlogging conference)

• Galaxy Zoo: Citizen science on Rails
  Awesome presentation on distributed citizen science.
  (tags: science2.0 citizenscience)
• PLoS ONE: The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations
  An alternative metric. It get’s pretty complicated pretty fast, making it tough to add a coherant snippet.
  (tags: alternativemetrics h-index bibliometrics)
• The Mouse Trap: Science 2.0 : what is and what needs to be
  Sandeep Guatam’s thoughts on the Patil and Siegel article: “However, while they believe that all the tools for online collaboration are already in place, I on the other hand think we need a more formalized one-stop system for scientists, where all their sharing, networking and collaborating needs are met…”
  (tags: science2.0 science scholarlycommunication)
• This revolution will be digitized: online tools for radical collaboration — DMM
  Inspiring article fantasizing about the potential of more collaborative science – “What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints? by Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel* via Chris’ FF
  (tags: 2collab collaboration science science2.0 scholarlycommunication)