• RT @cazzerson: Come work with us! RT @code4lib: Job: Digital Technologies Development Librarian at North Carolina State University http: … 2012-03-30
• RT @Layar: Layar 6.2 is available now for iPhone and Android. It comes with a great new feature: AR Video. Check it out! http://t.co/I5X … 2012-03-30
• RT @researchremix: new post: total-impact awarded $125k Sloan grant! @jasonpriem @researchremix @totalimpactdev http://t.co/LCPXZVm0 2012-03-30
• RT @Reaxys: InChI here, InChI there, InChIs everyhwere – how Elsevier uses InChI in SciVerse and Reaxys #acssandiego room 27A 11.25am 2012-03-29
• RT @Stew: Nice work @CameronNeylon (and @PLoS)! RT @p_binfield Fabulous new hire at PLoS – Cameron Neylon 2012-03-27
• RT @kejames: What’s not to love about this? MT @GrrlScientist Penguin poo viewed from space reveals new Antarctic colony locations http: … 2012-03-25
• RT @MyOpenArchive: Altmetrics in the Wild: Towards Creating a Live CV http://t.co/WcOZjMDi 2012-03-24
• RT @ReaderMeter: #altmetrics in the wild just hit the Wikipedia research mailing list, hope the two communities discover each other soon … 2012-03-24
• RT @morloca: What’s wrong with http://t.co/nnO0xY0d, http://t.co/e8ewpesU and ResearchGate? Answer: http://t.co/XXgNOpMv on @Quora 2012-03-24

• RT @McDawg: Also related – what do folks think about open peer review? Here’s the most recent poll I’m aware of http://t.co/DqhSkE6g #acwri 2012-03-15
• RT @invisiblecomma: I like DOIs, and I like Content Negotiation: http://t.co/VtwCBYf5 (and I’m glad @phillord is drawing attention to so … 2012-03-15
• RT @grsprings: library directors & senior administrators – please take my survey: http://t.co/FSazvB1x 2012-03-13
• RT @datadryad: “Big shoulders in scholarly communication: data archiving and altmetrics” slides from @researchremix at #HWMtg2012 http: … 2012-03-13
• RT @cazzerson: Congrats! RT @LibraryJournal: Movers & Shakers 2012: The People Shaping the Future of Libraries: http://t.co/0u7LW1E0 #li … 2012-03-13
• RT @Stew: Here’s a sneak peek video tour of the new Altmetric Explorer: http://t.co/GsyA3NCS . Sign up for early access at http://t.co/f … 2012-03-13
• RT @franknorman: “A transition to new breed of scientists who understand importance of sci netwks” What Is A Scientific Social Network? … 2012-03-12
• RT @SciVerseHub: Take A Look at What We Are Planning…:
  Release Date:Monday, March … htt … 2012-03-12
• Found on #Sciverse:Use of library space and the library as place http://t.co/DSOyTzb0 2012-03-12
• RT @briankelly: Twitterers Do It In Bed! Do you tweet work stuff in bed? Is this good or bad? https://t.co/a7IXbzPD (from Saturday) 2012-03-12
• RT @LibraryRenewal: “Librarians are the coolest people at SXSW.” – Monica Sack, Interactive ISA Coordinator http://t.co/rEOPHePv 2012-03-12
• Found on #Sciverse:A sensitivity analysis of researchers’ productivity rankings to the time of citation observation http://t.co/KGHh3xHT 2012-03-12
• Found on #Sciverse:A Hirsch-type index of co-author partnership ability http://t.co/BC438sDv 2012-03-12
• RT @rafaelsidi: RT @phylogenomics: The Evolution of Science: Open Publishing http://t.co/TPXUMQea 2012-03-11
• RT @dullhunk: “Human-brain peta-flops” A Citizen Science Approach for Improving Multiple Sequence Alignment http://t.co/P9qnFtiK via @PL … 2012-03-10

• RT @jasonpriem: Solid @insidehighered piece summarizing research on Twitter as means of scholarly dissemination. http://t.co/Vvo7PEpO #a … 2012-03-09
• RT @jasonpriem: total-impact gets £17,000 support from OSF: http://t.co/kQVsGwYK #epicwin #altmetrics 2012-03-09
• RT @daveyp: Deleting 10,000 MARC records. One of the few simple pleasures in life. DIE, MARC DIE! #ManiacalLaugh 2012-03-08
• RT @TAC_NISO: Library of Congress has announced that they will fully implement RDA: Resource Description and Access by 3/31/13 http://t. … 2012-03-08
• RT @jgold85: Important research: Beards augment perceptions of men’s age, social status, & aggressiveness, but not attractiveness http:/ … 2012-03-08
• RT @miriamkp: Opening for digital scholarship coordinator at Columbia U Library. http://t.co/bFYBTtJQ #altac 2012-03-08
• RT @mfenner: New blog post: Why I still like FriendFeed, why Twitter is important and other thoughts about #Altmetrics http://t.co/zvkxbtfM 2012-03-06
• RT @researchremix: New post: Talking text mining with Elsevier http://t.co/kSe9iryC 2012-03-06
• RT @totalimpactdev: feedback wanted: updated api spec http://t.co/kyBqBQPX 2012-03-04

Session abstract:
Do you have data? Have you decided that you want to publish that data in a friendly way? Then this session is for you. Allowing your data to be linked to other data sets is an obvious way to make your data more useful, and to contribute back to the data community that you are a part of, but the mechanics of how you do that is not always so clear cut. This session will discuss just that. With experts from the publishing world, the liked data community, and scientific data services, this is a unique opportunity to get an insight into how to create linked scientific data, and what you can do with it once you have created it.
- http://www.scienceonlinelondon.org/programme.php?tab=abstracts#breakout8

Richard Wallis’ slides from the session are available here:

http://www.slideshare.net/rjw/the-linked-data-publishing-threestep

Thanks to Ian Mulvany for organizing the panel:

http://directedgraph.net/2010/08/27/connecting-scientific-data/

• Data is at the heart of new science ecosystem – DATA – Research Information
  Article by Rafael: “Offering their content through open APIs, publishers and platform providers can present researchers with application building tools based on more comprehensive content. In fact, publishers and platform providers have an opportunity to serve as the host of the new scientific knowledge ecosystem that is evolving.”
  (tags: elsevier, apis, data, science, scholarlycommunication)

• The Indispensable Man of Open Science: A Talk with Cameron Neylon « Significant Science
  Lengthy and detailed interview with Cameron Neylon touching on just about everything related to Open Science.
  (tags: openscience opennotebook cameronneylon interview elsevier)

The videos of the Belgrade lectures are now loaded on the University of Belgrade Library’s YouTube channel.

The second day’s presentation was the more interesting topic and a better presentation overall, so I am going to highlight it first.  A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is here and the playlist for the second lecture is embedded below:

The first day’s presentation was titled From Academic Library 2.0 to (Literature) Research 2.0.  A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is located here and the playlist is embedded below:

I look forward to any feedback you might have on either presentation.

As mentioned in my previous post, my first Belgrade lecture focused on the concept of Research 2.0.  The second lecture focused on Scholarly Identity 2.0, which is increasingly important because of the wealth of online identity information created by Research 2.0.

The Scholarly Identity Matrix below is adapted from a general identity matrix concept pioneered by the founders of ClaimID. It is meant to display the different types and components of a researcher’s online identity.

The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model below displays how the different components from the Matrix fit together.

The black text is content types. The blue are the characteristics of identity these content types best represent. The green is who is responsible for managing this information. The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model takes the series of concept models one step farther, but with a slightly different twist.

The spectrum is more specific than in past models with one end being entirely user-generated content (UGC) and the other traditional scholarly communication. My hypothesis is that scholarly identity online, or Scholarly Identity 2.0, is a combination of these two information types held together by a unique identifier. For example, the combination verifies not just topical expertise through peer-review of articles, but also personality verified by LinkedIn recommendations.

Please share your thoughts on the accuracy of this model in the comments below or on FriendFeed.

The below presentation covers each quadrant of the Matrix culminating in the Concept Model as a summary.

• The eScience revolution: Creating semantic Web platforms for massive scientific collaboration
  (tags: science semantic toread)

Scholarly Reputation Management Online: The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media
Session 6: Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0
Social Software @ Work