- RT @cazzerson: Come work with us! RT @code4lib: Job: Digital Technologies Development Librarian at North Carolina State University http: … 2012-03-30
- RT @Layar: Layar 6.2 is available now for iPhone and Android. It comes with a great new feature: AR Video. Check it out! http://t.co/I5X … 2012-03-30
- RT @researchremix: new post: total-impact awarded $125k Sloan grant! @jasonpriem @researchremix @totalimpactdev http://t.co/LCPXZVm0 2012-03-30
- RT @Reaxys: InChI here, InChI there, InChIs everyhwere – how Elsevier uses InChI in SciVerse and Reaxys #acssandiego room 27A 11.25am 2012-03-29
- RT @Stew: Nice work @CameronNeylon (and @PLoS)! RT @p_binfield Fabulous new hire at PLoS – Cameron Neylon 2012-03-27
- RT @kejames: What’s not to love about this? MT @GrrlScientist Penguin poo viewed from space reveals new Antarctic colony locations http: … 2012-03-25
- RT @MyOpenArchive: Altmetrics in the Wild: Towards Creating a Live CV http://t.co/WcOZjMDi 2012-03-24
- RT @ReaderMeter: #altmetrics in the wild just hit the Wikipedia research mailing list, hope the two communities discover each other soon … 2012-03-24
- RT @morloca: What’s wrong with http://t.co/nnO0xY0d, http://t.co/e8ewpesU and ResearchGate? Answer: http://t.co/XXgNOpMv on @Quora 2012-03-24
Archive for the 'science 2.0' Category
-
Article by Rafael: “Offering their content through open APIs, publishers and platform providers can present researchers with application building tools based on more comprehensive content. In fact, publishers and platform providers have an opportunity to serve as the host of the new scientific knowledge ecosystem that is evolving.”
-
The Indispensable Man of Open Science: A Talk with Cameron Neylon « Significant ScienceLengthy and detailed interview with Cameron Neylon touching on just about everything related to Open Science.
The videos of the Belgrade lectures are now loaded on the University of Belgrade Library’s YouTube channel.
The second day’s presentation was the more interesting topic and a better presentation overall, so I am going to highlight it first. A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is here and the playlist for the second lecture is embedded below:
The first day’s presentation was titled From Academic Library 2.0 to (Literature) Research 2.0. A written overview of the highlights, key diagrams, and slides is located here and the playlist is embedded below:
I look forward to any feedback you might have on either presentation.
As mentioned in my previous post, my first Belgrade lecture focused on the concept of Research 2.0. The second lecture focused on Scholarly Identity 2.0, which is increasingly important because of the wealth of online identity information created by Research 2.0.
The Scholarly Identity Matrix below is adapted from a general identity matrix concept pioneered by the founders of ClaimID. It is meant to display the different types and components of a researcher’s online identity.
The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model below displays how the different components from the Matrix fit together.
The black text is content types. The blue are the characteristics of identity these content types best represent. The green is who is responsible for managing this information. The Scholarly Identity 2.0 Concept Model takes the series of concept models one step farther, but with a slightly different twist.
The spectrum is more specific than in past models with one end being entirely user-generated content (UGC) and the other traditional scholarly communication. My hypothesis is that scholarly identity online, or Scholarly Identity 2.0, is a combination of these two information types held together by a unique identifier. For example, the combination verifies not just topical expertise through peer-review of articles, but also personality verified by LinkedIn recommendations.
Please share your thoughts on the accuracy of this model in the comments below or on FriendFeed.
The below presentation covers each quadrant of the Matrix culminating in the Concept Model as a summary.
Scholarly Identity 2.0:
What does the Web say about your research
What does the Web say about your research
View more presentations from Michael Habib.
(Update: The videos of the lecture are now available here.)
I would like to give special thanks to Adam Sofronijevic, at the University of Belgrade Libraries for all his hard work in arranging the lectures and for his hospitality during my visit.
Scholarly Reputation Management Online : The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media
Session 6: Wissenschaftskommunikation 2.0
Social Software @ Work
Schloss Mickeln, Düsseldorf, 29. September 2009
View more presentations from Michael Habib.
Abstract: Social media provides scholars with unprecedented opportunities to promote their accomplishments and expertise. Conversely, social media creates more identity information to for scholars to manage. Different facets of scholar identity online will be introduced. Within this framework, new types of identity content produced by social software and the challenges this creates will be discussed. Lastly, opportunities for using social software to manage scholarly reputation will be explored.
Discussion: http://twitter.com/#search?q=sosoft09
#sosoft09 Wordle
