- @monther7 The best way to get all your articles into one profile is through the new Scopus Author Feedback Wizard: http://t.co/tjORo98 in reply to monther7 2011-08-10
Archive for the 'scholarly publishing' Category
Page 2 of 5
- EContent article I was interviewed for: One Book, Many Covers: Meeting the Challenges of Multiplatform Publishing http://t.co/AYKjm29 #li #
- 1Night.me: Renting (text)books a day at a time. #launch http://t.co/2TgThH0 via @1nightMe #
- BMJ Group blogs: BMJ Web Development Blog » Blog Archive » Scopus citation links, topic collection.. http://bit.ly/j1Jd0x #
- Scopus Alerts for BlackBerry now available – http://bit.ly/kCqoRU (for subscribers) alongside existing iPhone and Android versions. #
- Recent Nature article I was interviewed for and quoted in: “Social media: Self-reflection”, online http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nj7340-667a #li #
- #scibarcamb #li (@ Cambridge Union Society) http://4sq.com/f1276N #
- Liked “Another win 4 #openscience Elsevier launches new SciVerse app store w/ Mendeley data APIs http://bit.ly/dRPmrY" http://ff.im/-unKUl #
- Liked “http://developer.sciverse.com/sdk An eclipse plugin for the SciVerse Applications software development kit” http://ff.im/-u2lkB #
- Liked “browsing the sciverse app gallery http://www.applications.sciverse.com/action/gallery – more here than i…” http://ff.im/-tME82 #
- I just learned my colleague sent a response earlier today. We are brainstorming on how to get around this. re: http://ff.im/tAVIf #
- Liked “Rankings: WoS vs Scopus” http://ff.im/-cvWAc #
- Liked “Kein Link? RT @Scopus JAMA article says: Scopus has 22% more citations than WoS” http://ff.im/-8vvlr #
# habib: RT @jaykaydee: My dissertation: “Beliefs and Uses of Tagging Among Undergraduates” http://bit.ly/97bJQI If you’re into that sort of thing
# habib: RT @mfenner: New blog post: ORCID session at #solo10 and other important #orcid news http://bit.ly/crZzWg
# habib: RT @gthorisson: My latest SlideShare upload: ORCID presentation from Science Online London 2010 – http://slidesha.re/dqjO0F
# habib: RT @ORCID_Org: We’re officially a non-profit! Announced today, ORCID initiative is now ORCID, Inc http://bit.ly/c8L8hW
# RT @IanMulvany: #solo10 some pics and links to presentations from the session I hosted. http://directedgraph.net/2010/09/07/solo10-presentation-slides/
# WEBINAR (free): The Future of Search and Discovery, Sept. 8 w/ Jud Dunham and Cameron Neylon http://t.co/tiia9JS
# RT @Machemes: New and Unique Tool Eases the Process of Finding Article Reviewers: The search is based on the Scopus macheme fo… http://bit.ly/9U3bEy
# My slides from Connecting Scientific Resources at Science Online London 2010 available at http://t.co/3vrgEc1 #solo10 #li @IanMulvany @rjw
- From article about SNIP – “Across a subject field as broad as scholarly communication, assessing journal impact by citations to a journal in a two-year time frame is obviously going to favor those subjects that cite heavily, and rapidly. Some fields, particularly those in the life sciences, tend to conform to this citation pattern better than others, leading to some widely recognized distortions.”
- From article: “Prestige measured by quantity of citations is one thing, but when it is based on the quality of those citations, you get a better sense of the real value of research to a community. Research Trends talks to Prof. Félix de Moya about SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), which ranks journals based on where their citations originate.”
- From article :Bibliometric indicators are not without their own controversies (1, 2) and recently there has been an explosion of new metrics, accompanying a shift in the mindset of the scientific community towards a multidimensional view of journal evaluation.”
- Elsevier’s Scopus Partners with CWTS and SCImago to Offer Multidimensional Evaluation of Research JournalsFrom press release: “Elsevier… announced that its flagship product Scopus has successfully partnered with the Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) and the SCImago Research Group, endorsing two complementary journal metrics, SNIP and SJR. The metrics will be freely available online at www.journalmetrics.com, and integrated into Scopus, allowing researchers around the world to analyze journals within the abstract and citation database. The indicators will offer a greater currency and flexibility in journal performance measurement than any single-metric method currently available.”
- Download SNIP and SJR values for Scopus journals.
- “How do SJR and SNIP compare to the Impact Factor? They offer new perspectives in Journal Evaluation that look at the context in which a journal is performing and normalize for citation behaviour. Find more information at www.journalmetrics.com”
- Video
- “This short video explains how SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) are calculated. SJR and SNIP are considering in which context in which a Journal is performing looking at differences in research areas with different citation behaviours. “
- Looks like an interesting introductory course to the various concepts of scientific publishing and Science 2.0. (found because it linked to my Identity 2.0 post)
- “His presentation on scholarly identity 2.0 reminds me that academic libraries’ strategic planning should include a line item about assisting faculty with managing their digital reputation and identity (even promoting it).”
- Cornelius Puschmann’s Blog “…after which I went on a long but practically-oriented rant on scholarly communication in the digital age. “
- Belgrade lecture blog post.
