<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Democracy, Trust and Libraries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mchabib.com/2006/06/14/on-democracy-trust-and-libraries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mchabib.com/2006/06/14/on-democracy-trust-and-libraries/</link>
	<description>On Librarianship and the Information Sciences</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael C. Habib</title>
		<link>http://mchabib.com/2006/06/14/on-democracy-trust-and-libraries/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael C. Habib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mchabib.com/?p=45#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Wonderful.  I am not sure if I have stated it directly in my blog yet, but I think of this conceptual move to a read/write web is what defines Web 2.0.  It is what has turned traditional media upside down by challenging the idea of media as broadcast.  The conversation enabled by the read/write web is the underlying force behind most of Web 2.0.  Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-80979efe77ecd140229f6b8371fad7e9fcd1d632'>Wonderful.  I am not sure if I have stated it directly in my blog yet, but I think of this conceptual move to a read/write web is what defines Web 2.0.  It is what has turned traditional media upside down by challenging the idea of media as broadcast.  The conversation enabled by the read/write web is the underlying force behind most of Web 2.0.  Thanks for your comment.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy O'Connell</title>
		<link>http://mchabib.com/2006/06/14/on-democracy-trust-and-libraries/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy O'Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mchabib.com/?p=45#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think you have made some excellent connections here. Particularly where you demonstrate the conceptual move to read/write web.... "Traditionally, excluding our meeting rooms, we expected our patrons to use the knowledge they gained outside of the library. Eventually ideas would trickle back in through traditional media sources such as newspapers and books. The read/write web has sped this process up. Now it is possible for readers to feed their knowledge back into the system in real-time. Libraries have always been considered places of reading. Library 2.0 is a place of both reading and writing."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='microid-0255bd53f8687cb751b0dcf45b3a67ed7a7cc996'>I think you have made some excellent connections here. Particularly where you demonstrate the conceptual move to read/write web&#8230;. &#8220;Traditionally, excluding our meeting rooms, we expected our patrons to use the knowledge they gained outside of the library. Eventually ideas would trickle back in through traditional media sources such as newspapers and books. The read/write web has sped this process up. Now it is possible for readers to feed their knowledge back into the system in real-time. Libraries have always been considered places of reading. Library 2.0 is a place of both reading and writing.&#8221;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
